Learner Reviews & Feedback for Introduction to Cybersecurity Tools & Cyberattacks by IBM
About the Course
Top reviews
SN
Sep 5, 2023
The level of difficulty is just right with a lot of foundational information needed for a cybersecurity career start. Some of the online instructors were not audible enough during their presentations.
FS
Apr 10, 2020
Some video issues (audio problems, spelling issues, editing), the background web app is not particularly good at "handing off" lessons and you will repeat MANY videos, most weblinks are 404 errors.
3701 - 3725 of 4,190 Reviews for Introduction to Cybersecurity Tools & Cyberattacks
By Mathias M
•Jan 20, 2021
Sound quality really bad. Slides also in bad quality. Who uses Comic Sans? However, topics are clearly described and taught.
By Mohammed A D
•Aug 24, 2022
The audio in many of the clips was really poor and some of the slides had typos. Could do with a bit of quality assurance.
By Mihir G
•Nov 1, 2021
the video quality is terrible. only 480p ? and audio quality is also not good. otherwise the learning contend is the best.
By Aljouharh B
•Sep 25, 2020
The quality of the videos and audios is not good, I need to re-listen more than once and read the transcript to understand!
By Khristina S
•Jul 31, 2022
The volume would go in and out making it hard to hear but the transcript help me to follow what the instructor was saying.
By Raphael D
•Jun 2, 2022
Need a lower approach explaining terminologies and better examples. as well as appropriate feedback after passing quizzes.
By Donna P
•Apr 23, 2021
The transcription of the audio was problematic. The courses need proofreading and grammar editing for clearer learning.
By Abhishek K
•Dec 5, 2021
The audio of almost all the teachers is not clear. It's good to learn something new but it's not a professional course.
By Bobby B
•Jan 16, 2021
Wish the audio was better, subtitles kind of helped but would have enjoyed this more if the audio was of better quality
By Aditya S M
•Jul 3, 2020
must include the hands on tools and applications, many questions are predecessor asked than the actual study of it.
By Cristhian E J
•Jan 22, 2021
I think the topics are reviewed in a rush, you need to look for external information to understand some of the topics.
By Donald R
•Jul 20, 2021
We should be able to see the questions we got wrong and/or there should be an explanation of why we got them wrong
By Wasayf A
•Dec 16, 2020
it a good course information ,but I'm disappointment from video sound and video quality it too bad like 90's video
By Benjamin B
•Sep 20, 2020
Most of the presenters in the videos were very difficult to understand and the audio quality was terrible as well.
By Aman K
•Oct 13, 2020
I am giving only three stars because of sound quality. very difficult to understand because of bad sound quality.
By Safina K
•Feb 16, 2022
provide good overview of all topic related to cyber security. purely a beginner course . focus more on theory .
By gabriel h
•Sep 7, 2019
This course has a lack of profecionality, and good structure I can review my quiz for know was I am doing wrong
By Eric H
•Jul 28, 2022
Good introduction to Cybersecurity
The sound of some of the videos is very bad but most of them are good quality
By Alexandria N
•Apr 6, 2022
some professors were a bit hard to understand and the subtitles weren´t able to properly interpret them either.
By Adam R
•Jun 30, 2020
Great Content, terrible audio, and presenter accents and enthusiasm was not very good. Overall worth the effort
By Yash B
•Oct 31, 2022
Course is best but the sound quality of the videos is very low. You can't watch a video more than a minute.
By Cole C
•Aug 11, 2022
Good information, awesome presentation style. However very difficult to understand a few of the instructors.
By Mihai V
•Oct 26, 2020
I should be able to print an outline with the main concepts then I will be able to manage the course better.
By Javier S S
•Sep 2, 2021
Interesting way of introducing yourself to Cybersecurity but in my opinion the videos could be more concise
By Niklaus R
•Sep 13, 2020
Good content and structure, but many inaccuracies in the details (e.g. confusing message delay and replay).